in wars, we trade our loved ones and our power of giving them up for our purpose with the enemy's loved ones and power of sacrificing his/her loved ones. We do this until one of us run out of one of these two supplies.
But what purpose truly worth this huge cost?
What drives a war? One's feelings or mind? Or both? Or there is some other unknown creature in only a handful of men - who experienced some special things - which propose ideas alongside feelings and mind?
When you look into your own feelings, you may classify difficulty of understanding them vastly. If you say it's easy, you did not look enough. If you say it's complex, you are looking enough, but you're not trying to understand. When you start trying to understand your feelings, you realize it's deeply complicated. Sometimes its complication fools one to falsely believe one does realize the true nature of one's actions. Nietzsche in 1887 started his book, On the genealogy of morality, with the sentence "We are unknown to ourselves". So many people followed him. Some started to think about things that other people believed in but couldn't defend with facts. Some started to think about things that no one ever thought about. They all tried to understand what has happened to us, the human, in centuries, different civilizations, different laws, different lands, and different life styles, yet we still know our surrounding better than ourselves. Freud started something huge and fortunately we accepted his idea, not to mention our previous failures in ignoring people with shiny ahead-of-time thoughts, and studied it. We are studying ourselves for a long time. But as soon as we manage to clarify a part of this amusing painting, we find the details annoyingly unknown, and even sometimes we encounter an entirely new dimension of this - sometimes horribly enormous - painting. Things are getting more complicated as we step forward, although we hope that one day we solve everything. In fact that hope is what drives - almost - all scientists. Some enjoy their achievements and some ignore their remarkable ones and instead suffer their failures in pursue of empowering themselves to fight harder - but to what end?
One doesn't need to study books and papers to study oneself, as there were none for Freud. One just need oneself along with will. If you want to study yourself, you need to stop ignoring - It reminded me of a sentence from Russell "Men are born ignorant, not stupid. They are made stupid by education". Stupidity is not seeing a problem. Ignorant is seeing it, but ignoring it. I bet you can list a dozen of situations right now which you ignored something you thought it worth thinking. I can list a thousand. It took me a long time to realize that I need to save some of my free time to study myself. Now that I realized it, I can feel a part of my heart is crying for the time I wasted.
Some say time is the most valuable thing one got. I disagree. I say you choose what to value and what not. Your feelings tell you they need something. You provide them with it and they start asking for another thing. There is no guarantee that their thirst ever stops. So you may find yourself serving your own feelings your entire life. On the other hand, your mind only respond to surroundings. It proposes plots to exploit the opportunities which the world has an infinite supply. So you may find yourself following your mind your entire life.
Your mind deduce whether an opportunity worth taking or not - this part of some people's mind like me is broken, so they take any opportunity they face and at the end they will find themselves drawn and all the opportunities are lost. How does it deduce so? Among all the things it uses, "purpose" influence maybe the most.
There are long-term purposes and short-term ones. Besides, just as your mind has purposes, your feelings might have. So some questions pop-up:
1) Does our feelings account purposes at all? If so, is it only short-term or long-terms are accepted either?
2) Where does purposes come from per se?
3) How our unconsciousness influence our purposes?